.profile: Remove comment about setting mask.

It's generally a bad idea, leave it a profile_hook.
master
Pierre Neidhardt 2019-09-27 19:56:55 +02:00
parent 1274046f6c
commit 7460469f42
1 changed files with 0 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@ -3,25 +3,6 @@
## .bash_profile does not exist. If this file is not automatically sourced,
## do it from the shell config to me sure it applies to TTY as well.
## Mask
## Result for 027 is "rwxr-x---". 022 is the popular default.
##
## As a result applications make the bad assumption that "others" have access.
## Another drawback of 027 is that is behaves badly with default sudo config: for
## instance "sudo mkdir foo" will effectively create a "foo" folder whose owner
## is root and with permission 027, even if root's umask is 022. This is
## usually very bad.
## See https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sudo#Permissive_umask.
##
## It is possible to override sudo's umask by adding the following to the
## sudoers file:
##
## Defaults umask = 0022
## Defaults umask_override
# umask 027
## Preliminary path definitions. For security reasons (and bad programming
## assumptions) you should always append entries to PATH, not prepend them.
appendpath () {