2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@node Contributing
|
|
|
|
|
@chapter Contributing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This project is a cooperative effort, and we need your help to make it
|
|
|
|
|
grow! Please get in touch with us on @email{guix-devel@@gnu.org} and
|
|
|
|
|
@code{#guix} on the Freenode IRC network. We welcome ideas, bug
|
|
|
|
|
reports, patches, and anything that may be helpful to the project. We
|
|
|
|
|
particularly welcome help on packaging (@pxref{Packaging Guidelines}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-09 13:39:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex code of conduct, of contributors
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex contributor covenant
|
2015-12-09 18:29:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
We want to provide a warm, friendly, and harassment-free environment, so
|
|
|
|
|
that anyone can contribute to the best of their abilities. To this end
|
|
|
|
|
our project uses a ``Contributor Covenant'', which was adapted from
|
|
|
|
|
@url{http://contributor-covenant.org/}. You can find a local version in
|
|
|
|
|
the @file{CODE-OF-CONDUCT} file in the source tree.
|
2015-12-09 13:39:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-24 19:00:48 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Contributors are not required to use their legal name in patches and
|
|
|
|
|
on-line communication; they can use any name or pseudonym of their
|
|
|
|
|
choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
|
|
|
* Building from Git:: The latest and greatest.
|
|
|
|
|
* Running Guix Before It Is Installed:: Hacker tricks.
|
|
|
|
|
* The Perfect Setup:: The right tools.
|
2019-01-21 11:31:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
* Packaging Guidelines:: Growing the distribution.
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
* Coding Style:: Hygiene of the contributor.
|
|
|
|
|
* Submitting Patches:: Share your work.
|
|
|
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Building from Git
|
|
|
|
|
@section Building from Git
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to hack Guix itself, it is recommended to use the latest
|
2017-07-20 17:05:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
version from the Git repository:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
git clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When building Guix from a checkout,
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
the following packages are required in addition to those mentioned in
|
|
|
|
|
the installation instructions (@pxref{Requirements}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@itemize
|
|
|
|
|
@item @url{http://gnu.org/software/autoconf/, GNU Autoconf};
|
|
|
|
|
@item @url{http://gnu.org/software/automake/, GNU Automake};
|
|
|
|
|
@item @url{http://gnu.org/software/gettext/, GNU Gettext};
|
2015-09-13 17:00:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@item @url{http://gnu.org/software/texinfo/, GNU Texinfo};
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@item @url{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz};
|
|
|
|
|
@item @url{http://www.gnu.org/software/help2man/, GNU Help2man (optional)}.
|
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-22 11:24:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
The easiest way to set up a development environment for Guix is, of
|
|
|
|
|
course, by using Guix! The following command starts a new shell where
|
|
|
|
|
all the dependencies and appropriate environment variables are set up to
|
|
|
|
|
hack on Guix:
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-22 11:24:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix environment guix
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@xref{Invoking guix environment}, for more information on that command.
|
|
|
|
|
Extra dependencies can be added with @option{--ad-hoc}:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix environment guix --ad-hoc help2man git strace
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Run @command{./bootstrap} to generate the build system infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
using Autoconf and Automake. If you get an error like this one:
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
configure.ac:46: error: possibly undefined macro: PKG_CHECK_MODULES
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-22 11:24:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
it probably means that Autoconf couldn’t find @file{pkg.m4}, which is
|
2015-11-22 11:24:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
provided by pkg-config. Make sure that @file{pkg.m4} is available. The
|
|
|
|
|
same holds for the @file{guile.m4} set of macros provided by Guile. For
|
|
|
|
|
instance, if you installed Automake in @file{/usr/local}, it wouldn’t
|
|
|
|
|
look for @file{.m4} files in @file{/usr/share}. In that case, you have
|
|
|
|
|
to invoke the following command:
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
export ACLOCAL_PATH=/usr/share/aclocal
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-21 21:43:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@xref{Macro Search Path,,, automake, The GNU Automake Manual}, for
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-16 00:46:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Then, run @command{./configure} as usual. Make sure to pass
|
|
|
|
|
@code{--localstatedir=@var{directory}} where @var{directory} is the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{localstatedir} value used by your current installation (@pxref{The
|
|
|
|
|
Store}, for information about this).
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-16 00:46:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Finally, you have to invoke @code{make check} to run tests
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Running the Test Suite}). If anything
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fails, take a look at installation instructions (@pxref{Installation})
|
|
|
|
|
or send a message to the @email{guix-devel@@gnu.org, mailing list}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Running Guix Before It Is Installed
|
|
|
|
|
@section Running Guix Before It Is Installed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to keep a sane working environment, you will find it useful to
|
|
|
|
|
test the changes made in your local source tree checkout without
|
|
|
|
|
actually installing them. So that you can distinguish between your
|
|
|
|
|
``end-user'' hat and your ``motley'' costume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To that end, all the command-line tools can be used even if you have not
|
2018-07-04 14:36:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
run @code{make install}. To do that, you first need to have an environment
|
|
|
|
|
with all the dependencies available (@pxref{Building from Git}), and then
|
|
|
|
|
simply prefix each command with
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@command{./pre-inst-env} (the @file{pre-inst-env} script lives in the
|
2018-11-16 23:16:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
top build tree of Guix; it is generated by @command{./configure}),
|
|
|
|
|
as in@footnote{The @option{-E} flag to
|
2017-08-05 23:08:44 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@command{sudo} guarantees that @code{GUILE_LOAD_PATH} is correctly set
|
|
|
|
|
such that @command{guix-daemon} and the tools it uses can find the Guile
|
|
|
|
|
modules they need.}:
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2017-08-05 23:08:44 +02:00
|
|
|
|
$ sudo -E ./pre-inst-env guix-daemon --build-users-group=guixbuild
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
$ ./pre-inst-env guix build hello
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
|
|
|
Similarly, for a Guile session using the Guix modules:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
$ ./pre-inst-env guile -c '(use-modules (guix utils)) (pk (%current-system))'
|
2015-10-26 18:44:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;;; ("x86_64-linux")
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex REPL
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex read-eval-print loop
|
|
|
|
|
@dots{} and for a REPL (@pxref{Using Guile Interactively,,, guile, Guile
|
|
|
|
|
Reference Manual}):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
$ ./pre-inst-env guile
|
|
|
|
|
scheme@@(guile-user)> ,use(guix)
|
|
|
|
|
scheme@@(guile-user)> ,use(gnu)
|
|
|
|
|
scheme@@(guile-user)> (define snakes
|
|
|
|
|
(fold-packages
|
|
|
|
|
(lambda (package lst)
|
|
|
|
|
(if (string-prefix? "python"
|
|
|
|
|
(package-name package))
|
|
|
|
|
(cons package lst)
|
|
|
|
|
lst))
|
|
|
|
|
'()))
|
|
|
|
|
scheme@@(guile-user)> (length snakes)
|
|
|
|
|
$1 = 361
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The @command{pre-inst-env} script sets up all the environment variables
|
|
|
|
|
necessary to support this, including @env{PATH} and @env{GUILE_LOAD_PATH}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-02 16:34:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Note that @command{./pre-inst-env guix pull} does @emph{not} upgrade the
|
2018-05-30 17:50:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
local source tree; it simply updates the @file{~/.config/guix/current}
|
2015-11-02 16:34:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
symlink (@pxref{Invoking guix pull}). Run @command{git pull} instead if
|
2018-05-30 17:50:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
you want to upgrade your local source tree.
|
2015-11-02 16:34:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node The Perfect Setup
|
|
|
|
|
@section The Perfect Setup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Perfect Setup to hack on Guix is basically the perfect setup used
|
|
|
|
|
for Guile hacking (@pxref{Using Guile in Emacs,,, guile, Guile Reference
|
|
|
|
|
Manual}). First, you need more than an editor, you need
|
|
|
|
|
@url{http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs, Emacs}, empowered by the
|
2019-02-03 18:35:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
wonderful @url{http://nongnu.org/geiser/, Geiser}. To set that up, run:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix package -i emacs guile emacs-geiser
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geiser allows for interactive and incremental development from within
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs: code compilation and evaluation from within buffers, access to
|
|
|
|
|
on-line documentation (docstrings), context-sensitive completion,
|
|
|
|
|
@kbd{M-.} to jump to an object definition, a REPL to try out your code,
|
|
|
|
|
and more (@pxref{Introduction,,, geiser, Geiser User Manual}). For
|
|
|
|
|
convenient Guix development, make sure to augment Guile’s load path so
|
|
|
|
|
that it finds source files from your checkout:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
|
|
|
|
;; @r{Assuming the Guix checkout is in ~/src/guix.}
|
2015-11-14 19:13:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
(with-eval-after-load 'geiser-guile
|
|
|
|
|
(add-to-list 'geiser-guile-load-path "~/src/guix"))
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To actually edit the code, Emacs already has a neat Scheme mode. But in
|
|
|
|
|
addition to that, you must not miss
|
|
|
|
|
@url{http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/ParEdit, Paredit}. It provides
|
|
|
|
|
facilities to directly operate on the syntax tree, such as raising an
|
|
|
|
|
s-expression or wrapping it, swallowing or rejecting the following
|
|
|
|
|
s-expression, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-15 23:10:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex code snippets
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex templates
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex reducing boilerplate
|
|
|
|
|
We also provide templates for common git commit messages and package
|
|
|
|
|
definitions in the @file{etc/snippets} directory. These templates can
|
|
|
|
|
be used with @url{http://joaotavora.github.io/yasnippet/, YASnippet} to
|
|
|
|
|
expand short trigger strings to interactive text snippets. You may want
|
|
|
|
|
to add the snippets directory to the @var{yas-snippet-dirs} variable in
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
|
|
|
|
;; @r{Assuming the Guix checkout is in ~/src/guix.}
|
|
|
|
|
(with-eval-after-load 'yasnippet
|
|
|
|
|
(add-to-list 'yas-snippet-dirs "~/src/guix/etc/snippets"))
|
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The commit message snippets depend on @url{https://magit.vc/, Magit} to
|
|
|
|
|
display staged files. When editing a commit message type @code{add}
|
|
|
|
|
followed by @kbd{TAB} to insert a commit message template for adding a
|
|
|
|
|
package; type @code{update} followed by @kbd{TAB} to insert a template
|
2018-07-05 13:42:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
for updating a package; type @code{https} followed by @kbd{TAB} to
|
|
|
|
|
insert a template for changing the home page URI of a package to HTTPS.
|
2017-12-15 23:10:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main snippet for @code{scheme-mode} is triggered by typing
|
|
|
|
|
@code{package...} followed by @kbd{TAB}. This snippet also inserts the
|
|
|
|
|
trigger string @code{origin...}, which can be expanded further. The
|
|
|
|
|
@code{origin} snippet in turn may insert other trigger strings ending on
|
|
|
|
|
@code{...}, which also can be expanded further.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-21 11:31:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@node Packaging Guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
@section Packaging Guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex packages, creating
|
|
|
|
|
The GNU distribution is nascent and may well lack some of your favorite
|
|
|
|
|
packages. This section describes how you can help make the distribution
|
|
|
|
|
grow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free software packages are usually distributed in the form of
|
|
|
|
|
@dfn{source code tarballs}---typically @file{tar.gz} files that contain
|
|
|
|
|
all the source files. Adding a package to the distribution means
|
|
|
|
|
essentially two things: adding a @dfn{recipe} that describes how to
|
|
|
|
|
build the package, including a list of other packages required to build
|
|
|
|
|
it, and adding @dfn{package metadata} along with that recipe, such as a
|
|
|
|
|
description and licensing information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Guix all this information is embodied in @dfn{package definitions}.
|
|
|
|
|
Package definitions provide a high-level view of the package. They are
|
|
|
|
|
written using the syntax of the Scheme programming language; in fact,
|
|
|
|
|
for each package we define a variable bound to the package definition,
|
|
|
|
|
and export that variable from a module (@pxref{Package Modules}).
|
|
|
|
|
However, in-depth Scheme knowledge is @emph{not} a prerequisite for
|
|
|
|
|
creating packages. For more information on package definitions,
|
|
|
|
|
@pxref{Defining Packages}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a package definition is in place, stored in a file in the Guix
|
|
|
|
|
source tree, it can be tested using the @command{guix build} command
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Invoking guix build}). For example, assuming the new package is
|
|
|
|
|
called @code{gnew}, you may run this command from the Guix build tree
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Running Guix Before It Is Installed}):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
./pre-inst-env guix build gnew --keep-failed
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using @code{--keep-failed} makes it easier to debug build failures since
|
|
|
|
|
it provides access to the failed build tree. Another useful
|
|
|
|
|
command-line option when debugging is @code{--log-file}, to access the
|
|
|
|
|
build log.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the package is unknown to the @command{guix} command, it may be that
|
|
|
|
|
the source file contains a syntax error, or lacks a @code{define-public}
|
|
|
|
|
clause to export the package variable. To figure it out, you may load
|
|
|
|
|
the module from Guile to get more information about the actual error:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
./pre-inst-env guile -c '(use-modules (gnu packages gnew))'
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once your package builds correctly, please send us a patch
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Submitting Patches}). Well, if you need help, we will be happy to
|
|
|
|
|
help you too. Once the patch is committed in the Guix repository, the
|
|
|
|
|
new package automatically gets built on the supported platforms by
|
|
|
|
|
@url{http://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/master, our continuous integration
|
|
|
|
|
system}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex substituter
|
|
|
|
|
Users can obtain the new package definition simply by running
|
|
|
|
|
@command{guix pull} (@pxref{Invoking guix pull}). When
|
|
|
|
|
@code{@value{SUBSTITUTE-SERVER}} is done building the package, installing the
|
|
|
|
|
package automatically downloads binaries from there
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Substitutes}). The only place where human intervention is
|
|
|
|
|
needed is to review and apply the patch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
|
|
|
* Software Freedom:: What may go into the distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
* Package Naming:: What's in a name?
|
|
|
|
|
* Version Numbers:: When the name is not enough.
|
|
|
|
|
* Synopses and Descriptions:: Helping users find the right package.
|
|
|
|
|
* Python Modules:: A touch of British comedy.
|
|
|
|
|
* Perl Modules:: Little pearls.
|
|
|
|
|
* Java Packages:: Coffee break.
|
|
|
|
|
* Fonts:: Fond of fonts.
|
|
|
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Software Freedom
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Software Freedom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@c Adapted from http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html.
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex free software
|
|
|
|
|
The GNU operating system has been developed so that users can have
|
|
|
|
|
freedom in their computing. GNU is @dfn{free software}, meaning that
|
|
|
|
|
users have the @url{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html,four
|
|
|
|
|
essential freedoms}: to run the program, to study and change the program
|
|
|
|
|
in source code form, to redistribute exact copies, and to distribute
|
|
|
|
|
modified versions. Packages found in the GNU distribution provide only
|
|
|
|
|
software that conveys these four freedoms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the GNU distribution follow the
|
|
|
|
|
@url{http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html,free
|
|
|
|
|
software distribution guidelines}. Among other things, these guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
reject non-free firmware, recommendations of non-free software, and
|
|
|
|
|
discuss ways to deal with trademarks and patents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some otherwise free upstream package sources contain a small and optional
|
|
|
|
|
subset that violates the above guidelines, for instance because this subset
|
|
|
|
|
is itself non-free code. When that happens, the offending items are removed
|
|
|
|
|
with appropriate patches or code snippets in the @code{origin} form of the
|
|
|
|
|
package (@pxref{Defining Packages}). This way, @code{guix
|
|
|
|
|
build --source} returns the ``freed'' source rather than the unmodified
|
|
|
|
|
upstream source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Package Naming
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Package Naming
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex package name
|
|
|
|
|
A package has actually two names associated with it:
|
|
|
|
|
First, there is the name of the @emph{Scheme variable}, the one following
|
|
|
|
|
@code{define-public}. By this name, the package can be made known in the
|
|
|
|
|
Scheme code, for instance as input to another package. Second, there is
|
|
|
|
|
the string in the @code{name} field of a package definition. This name
|
|
|
|
|
is used by package management commands such as
|
|
|
|
|
@command{guix package} and @command{guix build}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both are usually the same and correspond to the lowercase conversion of
|
|
|
|
|
the project name chosen upstream, with underscores replaced with
|
|
|
|
|
hyphens. For instance, GNUnet is available as @code{gnunet}, and
|
|
|
|
|
SDL_net as @code{sdl-net}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We do not add @code{lib} prefixes for library packages, unless these are
|
|
|
|
|
already part of the official project name. But @pxref{Python
|
|
|
|
|
Modules} and @ref{Perl Modules} for special rules concerning modules for
|
|
|
|
|
the Python and Perl languages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Font package names are handled differently, @pxref{Fonts}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Version Numbers
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Version Numbers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex package version
|
|
|
|
|
We usually package only the latest version of a given free software
|
|
|
|
|
project. But sometimes, for instance for incompatible library versions,
|
|
|
|
|
two (or more) versions of the same package are needed. These require
|
|
|
|
|
different Scheme variable names. We use the name as defined
|
|
|
|
|
in @ref{Package Naming}
|
|
|
|
|
for the most recent version; previous versions use the same name, suffixed
|
|
|
|
|
by @code{-} and the smallest prefix of the version number that may
|
|
|
|
|
distinguish the two versions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The name inside the package definition is the same for all versions of a
|
|
|
|
|
package and does not contain any version number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For instance, the versions 2.24.20 and 3.9.12 of GTK+ may be packaged as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
(define-public gtk+
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
(name "gtk+")
|
|
|
|
|
(version "3.9.12")
|
|
|
|
|
...))
|
|
|
|
|
(define-public gtk+-2
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
(name "gtk+")
|
|
|
|
|
(version "2.24.20")
|
|
|
|
|
...))
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
If we also wanted GTK+ 3.8.2, this would be packaged as
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
(define-public gtk+-3.8
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
(name "gtk+")
|
|
|
|
|
(version "3.8.2")
|
|
|
|
|
...))
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@c See <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-01/msg00425.html>,
|
|
|
|
|
@c for a discussion of what follows.
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex version number, for VCS snapshots
|
|
|
|
|
Occasionally, we package snapshots of upstream's version control system
|
|
|
|
|
(VCS) instead of formal releases. This should remain exceptional,
|
|
|
|
|
because it is up to upstream developers to clarify what the stable
|
|
|
|
|
release is. Yet, it is sometimes necessary. So, what should we put in
|
|
|
|
|
the @code{version} field?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly, we need to make the commit identifier of the VCS snapshot
|
|
|
|
|
visible in the version string, but we also need to make sure that the
|
|
|
|
|
version string is monotonically increasing so that @command{guix package
|
|
|
|
|
--upgrade} can determine which version is newer. Since commit
|
|
|
|
|
identifiers, notably with Git, are not monotonically increasing, we add
|
|
|
|
|
a revision number that we increase each time we upgrade to a newer
|
|
|
|
|
snapshot. The resulting version string looks like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
2.0.11-3.cabba9e
|
|
|
|
|
^ ^ ^
|
|
|
|
|
| | `-- upstream commit ID
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| `--- Guix package revision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
latest upstream version
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a good idea to strip commit identifiers in the @code{version}
|
|
|
|
|
field to, say, 7 digits. It avoids an aesthetic annoyance (assuming
|
|
|
|
|
aesthetics have a role to play here) as well as problems related to OS
|
|
|
|
|
limits such as the maximum shebang length (127 bytes for the Linux
|
|
|
|
|
kernel.) It is best to use the full commit identifiers in
|
|
|
|
|
@code{origin}s, though, to avoid ambiguities. A typical package
|
|
|
|
|
definition may look like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
(define my-package
|
|
|
|
|
(let ((commit "c3f29bc928d5900971f65965feaae59e1272a3f7")
|
|
|
|
|
(revision "1")) ;Guix package revision
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
(version (git-version "0.9" revision commit))
|
|
|
|
|
(source (origin
|
|
|
|
|
(method git-fetch)
|
|
|
|
|
(uri (git-reference
|
|
|
|
|
(url "git://example.org/my-package.git")
|
|
|
|
|
(commit commit)))
|
|
|
|
|
(sha256 (base32 "1mbikn@dots{}"))
|
|
|
|
|
(file-name (git-file-name name version))))
|
|
|
|
|
;; @dots{}
|
|
|
|
|
)))
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Synopses and Descriptions
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Synopses and Descriptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex package description
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex package synopsis
|
|
|
|
|
As we have seen before, each package in GNU@tie{}Guix includes a
|
|
|
|
|
synopsis and a description (@pxref{Defining Packages}). Synopses and
|
|
|
|
|
descriptions are important: They are what @command{guix package
|
|
|
|
|
--search} searches, and a crucial piece of information to help users
|
|
|
|
|
determine whether a given package suits their needs. Consequently,
|
|
|
|
|
packagers should pay attention to what goes into them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Synopses must start with a capital letter and must not end with a
|
|
|
|
|
period. They must not start with ``a'' or ``the'', which usually does
|
|
|
|
|
not bring anything; for instance, prefer ``File-frobbing tool'' over ``A
|
|
|
|
|
tool that frobs files''. The synopsis should say what the package
|
|
|
|
|
is---e.g., ``Core GNU utilities (file, text, shell)''---or what it is
|
|
|
|
|
used for---e.g., the synopsis for GNU@tie{}grep is ``Print lines
|
|
|
|
|
matching a pattern''.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep in mind that the synopsis must be meaningful for a very wide
|
|
|
|
|
audience. For example, ``Manipulate alignments in the SAM format''
|
|
|
|
|
might make sense for a seasoned bioinformatics researcher, but might be
|
|
|
|
|
fairly unhelpful or even misleading to a non-specialized audience. It
|
|
|
|
|
is a good idea to come up with a synopsis that gives an idea of the
|
|
|
|
|
application domain of the package. In this example, this might give
|
|
|
|
|
something like ``Manipulate nucleotide sequence alignments'', which
|
|
|
|
|
hopefully gives the user a better idea of whether this is what they are
|
|
|
|
|
looking for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptions should take between five and ten lines. Use full
|
|
|
|
|
sentences, and avoid using acronyms without first introducing them.
|
|
|
|
|
Please avoid marketing phrases such as ``world-leading'',
|
|
|
|
|
``industrial-strength'', and ``next-generation'', and avoid superlatives
|
|
|
|
|
like ``the most advanced''---they are not helpful to users looking for a
|
|
|
|
|
package and may even sound suspicious. Instead, try to be factual,
|
|
|
|
|
mentioning use cases and features.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex Texinfo markup, in package descriptions
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptions can include Texinfo markup, which is useful to introduce
|
|
|
|
|
ornaments such as @code{@@code} or @code{@@dfn}, bullet lists, or
|
|
|
|
|
hyperlinks (@pxref{Overview,,, texinfo, GNU Texinfo}). However you
|
|
|
|
|
should be careful when using some characters for example @samp{@@} and
|
|
|
|
|
curly braces which are the basic special characters in Texinfo
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Special Characters,,, texinfo, GNU Texinfo}). User interfaces
|
|
|
|
|
such as @command{guix package --show} take care of rendering it
|
|
|
|
|
appropriately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Synopses and descriptions are translated by volunteers
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{http://translationproject.org/domain/guix-packages.html, at the
|
|
|
|
|
Translation Project} so that as many users as possible can read them in
|
|
|
|
|
their native language. User interfaces search them and display them in
|
|
|
|
|
the language specified by the current locale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To allow @command{xgettext} to extract them as translatable strings,
|
|
|
|
|
synopses and descriptions @emph{must be literal strings}. This means
|
|
|
|
|
that you cannot use @code{string-append} or @code{format} to construct
|
|
|
|
|
these strings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
;; @dots{}
|
|
|
|
|
(synopsis "This is translatable")
|
|
|
|
|
(description (string-append "This is " "*not*" " translatable.")))
|
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation is a lot of work so, as a packager, please pay even more
|
|
|
|
|
attention to your synopses and descriptions as every change may entail
|
|
|
|
|
additional work for translators. In order to help them, it is possible
|
|
|
|
|
to make recommendations or instructions visible to them by inserting
|
|
|
|
|
special comments like this (@pxref{xgettext Invocation,,, gettext, GNU
|
|
|
|
|
Gettext}):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
;; TRANSLATORS: "X11 resize-and-rotate" should not be translated.
|
|
|
|
|
(description "ARandR is designed to provide a simple visual front end
|
|
|
|
|
for the X11 resize-and-rotate (RandR) extension. @dots{}")
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Python Modules
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Python Modules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex python
|
|
|
|
|
We currently package Python 2 and Python 3, under the Scheme variable names
|
|
|
|
|
@code{python-2} and @code{python} as explained in @ref{Version Numbers}.
|
|
|
|
|
To avoid confusion and naming clashes with other programming languages, it
|
|
|
|
|
seems desirable that the name of a package for a Python module contains
|
|
|
|
|
the word @code{python}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some modules are compatible with only one version of Python, others with both.
|
|
|
|
|
If the package Foo compiles only with Python 3, we name it
|
|
|
|
|
@code{python-foo}; if it compiles only with Python 2, we name it
|
|
|
|
|
@code{python2-foo}. If it is compatible with both versions, we create two
|
|
|
|
|
packages with the corresponding names.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a project already contains the word @code{python}, we drop this;
|
|
|
|
|
for instance, the module python-dateutil is packaged under the names
|
|
|
|
|
@code{python-dateutil} and @code{python2-dateutil}. If the project name
|
|
|
|
|
starts with @code{py} (e.g.@: @code{pytz}), we keep it and prefix it as
|
|
|
|
|
described above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsubsection Specifying Dependencies
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex inputs, for Python packages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dependency information for Python packages is usually available in the
|
|
|
|
|
package source tree, with varying degrees of accuracy: in the
|
|
|
|
|
@file{setup.py} file, in @file{requirements.txt}, or in @file{tox.ini}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your mission, when writing a recipe for a Python package, is to map
|
|
|
|
|
these dependencies to the appropriate type of ``input'' (@pxref{package
|
|
|
|
|
Reference, inputs}). Although the @code{pypi} importer normally does a
|
|
|
|
|
good job (@pxref{Invoking guix import}), you may want to check the
|
|
|
|
|
following check list to determine which dependency goes where.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
We currently package Python 2 with @code{setuptools} and @code{pip}
|
|
|
|
|
installed like Python 3.4 has per default. Thus you don't need to
|
|
|
|
|
specify either of these as an input. @command{guix lint} will warn you
|
|
|
|
|
if you do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Python dependencies required at run time go into
|
|
|
|
|
@code{propagated-inputs}. They are typically defined with the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{install_requires} keyword in @file{setup.py}, or in the
|
|
|
|
|
@file{requirements.txt} file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Python packages required only at build time---e.g., those listed with
|
|
|
|
|
the @code{setup_requires} keyword in @file{setup.py}---or only for
|
|
|
|
|
testing---e.g., those in @code{tests_require}---go into
|
|
|
|
|
@code{native-inputs}. The rationale is that (1) they do not need to be
|
|
|
|
|
propagated because they are not needed at run time, and (2) in a
|
|
|
|
|
cross-compilation context, it's the ``native'' input that we'd want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples are the @code{pytest}, @code{mock}, and @code{nose} test
|
|
|
|
|
frameworks. Of course if any of these packages is also required at
|
|
|
|
|
run-time, it needs to go to @code{propagated-inputs}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Anything that does not fall in the previous categories goes to
|
|
|
|
|
@code{inputs}, for example programs or C libraries required for building
|
|
|
|
|
Python packages containing C extensions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
If a Python package has optional dependencies (@code{extras_require}),
|
|
|
|
|
it is up to you to decide whether to add them or not, based on their
|
|
|
|
|
usefulness/overhead ratio (@pxref{Submitting Patches, @command{guix
|
|
|
|
|
size}}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Perl Modules
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Perl Modules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex perl
|
|
|
|
|
Perl programs standing for themselves are named as any other package,
|
|
|
|
|
using the lowercase upstream name.
|
|
|
|
|
For Perl packages containing a single class, we use the lowercase class name,
|
|
|
|
|
replace all occurrences of @code{::} by dashes and prepend the prefix
|
|
|
|
|
@code{perl-}.
|
|
|
|
|
So the class @code{XML::Parser} becomes @code{perl-xml-parser}.
|
|
|
|
|
Modules containing several classes keep their lowercase upstream name and
|
|
|
|
|
are also prepended by @code{perl-}. Such modules tend to have the word
|
|
|
|
|
@code{perl} somewhere in their name, which gets dropped in favor of the
|
|
|
|
|
prefix. For instance, @code{libwww-perl} becomes @code{perl-libwww}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Java Packages
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Java Packages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex java
|
|
|
|
|
Java programs standing for themselves are named as any other package,
|
|
|
|
|
using the lowercase upstream name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To avoid confusion and naming clashes with other programming languages,
|
|
|
|
|
it is desirable that the name of a package for a Java package is
|
|
|
|
|
prefixed with @code{java-}. If a project already contains the word
|
|
|
|
|
@code{java}, we drop this; for instance, the package @code{ngsjava} is
|
|
|
|
|
packaged under the name @code{java-ngs}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Java packages containing a single class or a small class hierarchy,
|
|
|
|
|
we use the lowercase class name, replace all occurrences of @code{.} by
|
|
|
|
|
dashes and prepend the prefix @code{java-}. So the class
|
|
|
|
|
@code{apache.commons.cli} becomes package
|
|
|
|
|
@code{java-apache-commons-cli}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Fonts
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Fonts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex fonts
|
|
|
|
|
For fonts that are in general not installed by a user for typesetting
|
|
|
|
|
purposes, or that are distributed as part of a larger software package,
|
|
|
|
|
we rely on the general packaging rules for software; for instance, this
|
|
|
|
|
applies to the fonts delivered as part of the X.Org system or fonts that
|
|
|
|
|
are part of TeX Live.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To make it easier for a user to search for fonts, names for other packages
|
|
|
|
|
containing only fonts are constructed as follows, independently of the
|
|
|
|
|
upstream package name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The name of a package containing only one font family starts with
|
|
|
|
|
@code{font-}; it is followed by the foundry name and a dash @code{-}
|
|
|
|
|
if the foundry is known, and the font family name, in which spaces are
|
|
|
|
|
replaced by dashes (and as usual, all upper case letters are transformed
|
|
|
|
|
to lower case).
|
|
|
|
|
For example, the Gentium font family by SIL is packaged under the name
|
|
|
|
|
@code{font-sil-gentium}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a package containing several font families, the name of the collection
|
|
|
|
|
is used in the place of the font family name.
|
|
|
|
|
For instance, the Liberation fonts consist of three families,
|
|
|
|
|
Liberation Sans, Liberation Serif and Liberation Mono.
|
|
|
|
|
These could be packaged separately under the names
|
|
|
|
|
@code{font-liberation-sans} and so on; but as they are distributed together
|
|
|
|
|
under a common name, we prefer to package them together as
|
|
|
|
|
@code{font-liberation}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the case where several formats of the same font family or font collection
|
|
|
|
|
are packaged separately, a short form of the format, prepended by a dash,
|
|
|
|
|
is added to the package name. We use @code{-ttf} for TrueType fonts,
|
|
|
|
|
@code{-otf} for OpenType fonts and @code{-type1} for PostScript Type 1
|
|
|
|
|
fonts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@node Coding Style
|
|
|
|
|
@section Coding Style
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In general our code follows the GNU Coding Standards (@pxref{Top,,,
|
|
|
|
|
standards, GNU Coding Standards}). However, they do not say much about
|
|
|
|
|
Scheme, so here are some additional rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
|
|
|
* Programming Paradigm:: How to compose your elements.
|
|
|
|
|
* Modules:: Where to store your code?
|
|
|
|
|
* Data Types and Pattern Matching:: Implementing data structures.
|
|
|
|
|
* Formatting Code:: Writing conventions.
|
|
|
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Programming Paradigm
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Programming Paradigm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheme code in Guix is written in a purely functional style. One
|
|
|
|
|
exception is code that involves input/output, and procedures that
|
|
|
|
|
implement low-level concepts, such as the @code{memoize} procedure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Modules
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Modules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guile modules that are meant to be used on the builder side must live in
|
|
|
|
|
the @code{(guix build @dots{})} name space. They must not refer to
|
|
|
|
|
other Guix or GNU modules. However, it is OK for a ``host-side'' module
|
|
|
|
|
to use a build-side module.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modules that deal with the broader GNU system should be in the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{(gnu @dots{})} name space rather than @code{(guix @dots{})}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Data Types and Pattern Matching
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Data Types and Pattern Matching
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tendency in classical Lisp is to use lists to represent everything,
|
|
|
|
|
and then to browse them ``by hand'' using @code{car}, @code{cdr},
|
|
|
|
|
@code{cadr}, and co. There are several problems with that style,
|
|
|
|
|
notably the fact that it is hard to read, error-prone, and a hindrance
|
|
|
|
|
to proper type error reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guix code should define appropriate data types (for instance, using
|
|
|
|
|
@code{define-record-type*}) rather than abuse lists. In addition, it
|
|
|
|
|
should use pattern matching, via Guile’s @code{(ice-9 match)} module,
|
|
|
|
|
especially when matching lists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Formatting Code
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Formatting Code
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-12 14:56:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex formatting code
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex coding style
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
When writing Scheme code, we follow common wisdom among Scheme
|
|
|
|
|
programmers. In general, we follow the
|
|
|
|
|
@url{http://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/style.txt, Riastradh's Lisp
|
|
|
|
|
Style Rules}. This document happens to describe the conventions mostly
|
|
|
|
|
used in Guile’s code too. It is very thoughtful and well written, so
|
|
|
|
|
please do read it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some special forms introduced in Guix, such as the @code{substitute*}
|
|
|
|
|
macro, have special indentation rules. These are defined in the
|
2017-04-28 14:52:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@file{.dir-locals.el} file, which Emacs automatically uses. Also note
|
|
|
|
|
that Emacs-Guix provides @code{guix-devel-mode} mode that indents and
|
|
|
|
|
highlights Guix code properly (@pxref{Development,,, emacs-guix, The
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs-Guix Reference Manual}).
|
2017-01-12 14:56:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex indentation, of code
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex formatting, of code
|
|
|
|
|
If you do not use Emacs, please make sure to let your editor knows these
|
|
|
|
|
rules. To automatically indent a package definition, you can also run:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2017-01-13 18:47:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
./etc/indent-code.el gnu/packages/@var{file}.scm @var{package}
|
2017-01-12 14:56:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
|
|
|
This automatically indents the definition of @var{package} in
|
2017-01-13 18:47:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@file{gnu/packages/@var{file}.scm} by running Emacs in batch mode. To
|
|
|
|
|
indent a whole file, omit the second argument:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
./etc/indent-code.el gnu/services/@var{file}.scm
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-27 15:12:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex Vim, Scheme code editing
|
|
|
|
|
If you are editing code with Vim, we recommend that you run @code{:set
|
|
|
|
|
autoindent} so that your code is automatically indented as you type.
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally,
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3998,
|
|
|
|
|
@code{paredit.vim}} may help you deal with all these parentheses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
We require all top-level procedures to carry a docstring. This
|
|
|
|
|
requirement can be relaxed for simple private procedures in the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{(guix build @dots{})} name space, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Procedures should not have more than four positional parameters. Use
|
|
|
|
|
keyword parameters for procedures that take more than four parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Submitting Patches
|
|
|
|
|
@section Submitting Patches
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development is done using the Git distributed version control system.
|
|
|
|
|
Thus, access to the repository is not strictly necessary. We welcome
|
|
|
|
|
contributions in the form of patches as produced by @code{git
|
2017-02-13 09:56:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
format-patch} sent to the @email{guix-patches@@gnu.org} mailing list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This mailing list is backed by a Debbugs instance accessible at
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://bugs.gnu.org/guix-patches}, which allows us to keep track
|
|
|
|
|
of submissions. Each message sent to that mailing list gets a new
|
|
|
|
|
tracking number assigned; people can then follow up on the submission by
|
|
|
|
|
sending email to @code{@var{NNN}@@debbugs.gnu.org}, where @var{NNN} is
|
2017-09-18 11:12:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
the tracking number (@pxref{Sending a Patch Series}).
|
2017-02-13 09:56:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Please write commit logs in the ChangeLog format (@pxref{Change Logs,,,
|
|
|
|
|
standards, GNU Coding Standards}); you can check the commit history for
|
|
|
|
|
examples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before submitting a patch that adds or modifies a package definition,
|
2015-06-18 00:22:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
please run through this check list:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@enumerate
|
2017-11-08 17:19:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
If the authors of the packaged software provide a cryptographic
|
|
|
|
|
signature for the release tarball, make an effort to verify the
|
|
|
|
|
authenticity of the archive. For a detached GPG signature file this
|
|
|
|
|
would be done with the @code{gpg --verify} command.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-15 22:37:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Take some time to provide an adequate synopsis and description for the
|
|
|
|
|
package. @xref{Synopses and Descriptions}, for some guidelines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-18 00:22:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Run @code{guix lint @var{package}}, where @var{package} is the
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
name of the new or modified package, and fix any errors it reports
|
2015-06-18 00:22:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Invoking guix lint}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure the package builds on your platform, using @code{guix build
|
|
|
|
|
@var{package}}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-28 15:41:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex bundling
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure the package does not use bundled copies of software already
|
|
|
|
|
available as separate packages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes, packages include copies of the source code of their
|
|
|
|
|
dependencies as a convenience for users. However, as a distribution, we
|
|
|
|
|
want to make sure that such packages end up using the copy we already
|
|
|
|
|
have in the distribution, if there is one. This improves resource usage
|
|
|
|
|
(the dependency is built and stored only once), and allows the
|
|
|
|
|
distribution to make transverse changes such as applying security
|
|
|
|
|
updates for a given software package in a single place and have them
|
|
|
|
|
affect the whole system---something that bundled copies prevent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-18 00:22:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at the profile reported by @command{guix size}
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Invoking guix size}). This will allow you to notice references
|
|
|
|
|
to other packages unwillingly retained. It may also help determine
|
|
|
|
|
whether to split the package (@pxref{Packages with Multiple Outputs}),
|
2018-12-15 00:20:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
and which optional dependencies should be used. In particular, avoid adding
|
2018-12-15 19:21:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@code{texlive} as a dependency: because of its extreme size, use
|
|
|
|
|
@code{texlive-tiny} or @code{texlive-union} instead.
|
2015-06-18 00:22:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
For important changes, check that dependent package (if applicable) are
|
|
|
|
|
not affected by the change; @code{guix refresh --list-dependent
|
2015-06-10 13:39:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@var{package}} will help you do that (@pxref{Invoking guix refresh}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-13 22:24:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@c See <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html>.
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex branching strategy
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex rebuild scheduling strategy
|
|
|
|
|
Depending on the number of dependent packages and thus the amount of
|
|
|
|
|
rebuilding induced, commits go to different branches, along these lines:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@table @asis
|
|
|
|
|
@item 300 dependent packages or less
|
|
|
|
|
@code{master} branch (non-disruptive changes).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item between 300 and 1,200 dependent packages
|
|
|
|
|
@code{staging} branch (non-disruptive changes). This branch is intended
|
|
|
|
|
to be merged in @code{master} every 3 weeks or so. Topical changes
|
|
|
|
|
(e.g., an update of the GNOME stack) can instead go to a specific branch
|
|
|
|
|
(say, @code{gnome-updates}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item more than 1,200 dependent packages
|
|
|
|
|
@code{core-updates} branch (may include major and potentially disruptive
|
|
|
|
|
changes). This branch is intended to be merged in @code{master} every
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 months or so.
|
|
|
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-05-26 15:39:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
All these branches are @uref{https://hydra.gnu.org/project/gnu,
|
|
|
|
|
tracked by our build farm} and merged into @code{master} once
|
2016-07-28 15:24:37 +02:00
|
|
|
|
everything has been successfully built. This allows us to fix issues
|
|
|
|
|
before they hit users, and to reduce the window during which pre-built
|
|
|
|
|
binaries are not available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-05-26 15:39:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Generally, branches other than @code{master} are considered
|
|
|
|
|
@emph{frozen} if there has been a recent evaluation, or there is a
|
|
|
|
|
corresponding @code{-next} branch. Please ask on the mailing list or
|
|
|
|
|
IRC if unsure where to place a patch.
|
|
|
|
|
@c TODO: It would be good with badges on the website that tracks these
|
|
|
|
|
@c branches. Or maybe even a status page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-20 00:55:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
2015-12-08 23:27:53 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex determinism, of build processes
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex reproducible builds, checking
|
2015-10-20 00:55:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Check whether the package's build process is deterministic. This
|
|
|
|
|
typically means checking whether an independent build of the package
|
|
|
|
|
yields the exact same result that you obtained, bit for bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-08 23:27:53 +01:00
|
|
|
|
A simple way to do that is by building the same package several times in
|
|
|
|
|
a row on your machine (@pxref{Invoking guix build}):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix build --rounds=2 my-package
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is enough to catch a class of common non-determinism issues, such
|
|
|
|
|
as timestamps or randomly-generated output in the build result.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another option is to use @command{guix challenge} (@pxref{Invoking guix
|
|
|
|
|
challenge}). You may run it once the package has been committed and
|
2018-12-03 16:22:43 +01:00
|
|
|
|
built by @code{@value{SUBSTITUTE-SERVER}} to check whether it obtains the same
|
2015-12-08 23:27:53 +01:00
|
|
|
|
result as you did. Better yet: Find another machine that can build it
|
|
|
|
|
and run @command{guix publish}. Since the remote build machine is
|
|
|
|
|
likely different from yours, this can catch non-determinism issues
|
|
|
|
|
related to the hardware---e.g., use of different instruction set
|
|
|
|
|
extensions---or to the operating system kernel---e.g., reliance on
|
|
|
|
|
@code{uname} or @file{/proc} files.
|
2015-10-20 00:55:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-21 20:05:39 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
When writing documentation, please use gender-neutral wording when
|
|
|
|
|
referring to people, such as
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they, singular
|
|
|
|
|
``they''@comma{} ``their''@comma{} ``them''}, and so forth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-21 20:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Verify that your patch contains only one set of related changes.
|
|
|
|
|
Bundling unrelated changes together makes reviewing harder and slower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples of unrelated changes include the addition of several packages,
|
|
|
|
|
or a package update along with fixes to that package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-12 14:56:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Please follow our code formatting rules, possibly running the
|
2017-01-13 18:47:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
@command{etc/indent-code.el} script to do that automatically for you
|
2017-01-12 14:56:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Formatting Code}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-10 18:06:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
When possible, use mirrors in the source URL (@pxref{Invoking guix download}).
|
|
|
|
|
Use reliable URLs, not generated ones. For instance, GitHub archives are not
|
|
|
|
|
necessarily identical from one generation to the next, so in this case it's
|
|
|
|
|
often better to clone the repository. Don't use the @command{name} field in
|
|
|
|
|
the URL: it is not very useful and if the name changes, the URL will probably
|
|
|
|
|
be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-18 00:22:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@end enumerate
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-23 07:25:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
When posting a patch to the mailing list, use @samp{[PATCH] @dots{}} as
|
|
|
|
|
a subject. You may use your email client or the @command{git
|
2017-09-18 11:12:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
send-email} command (@pxref{Sending a Patch Series}). We prefer to get
|
|
|
|
|
patches in plain text messages, either inline or as MIME attachments.
|
|
|
|
|
You are advised to pay attention if your email client changes anything
|
|
|
|
|
like line breaks or indentation which could potentially break the
|
|
|
|
|
patches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-18 17:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
When a bug is resolved, please close the thread by sending an email to
|
|
|
|
|
@email{@var{NNN}-done@@debbugs.gnu.org}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-18 11:12:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
@unnumberedsubsec Sending a Patch Series
|
|
|
|
|
@anchor{Sending a Patch Series}
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex patch series
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{git send-email}
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{git-send-email}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When sending a patch series (e.g., using @code{git send-email}), please
|
|
|
|
|
first send one message to @email{guix-patches@@gnu.org}, and then send
|
|
|
|
|
subsequent patches to @email{@var{NNN}@@debbugs.gnu.org} to make sure
|
|
|
|
|
they are kept together. See
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://debbugs.gnu.org/Advanced.html, the Debbugs documentation}
|
|
|
|
|
for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
@c Debbugs bug: https://debbugs.gnu.org/db/15/15361.html
|