2012-10-25 23:44:27 +02:00
|
|
|
|
-*- mode: org; coding: utf-8; -*-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-17 23:53:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
#+TITLE: Hacking GNU Guix and Its Incredible Distro
|
2012-10-25 23:44:27 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-08 22:57:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2012, 2013 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
|
2012-10-25 23:44:27 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification,
|
|
|
|
|
are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright
|
|
|
|
|
notice and this notice are preserved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-17 23:53:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
* Running Guix before it is installed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Command-line tools can be used even if you have not run "make install".
|
|
|
|
|
To do that, prefix each command with ‘./pre-inst-env’, as in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-04 10:29:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
./pre-inst-env guix build --help
|
2013-01-17 23:53:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similarly, for a Guile session using the Guix modules:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./pre-inst-env guile -c '(use-modules (guix utils)) (pk (%current-system))'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ‘pre-inst-env’ script sets up all the environment variables
|
|
|
|
|
necessary to support this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-21 21:35:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
* The Perfect Setup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Perfect Setup to hack on Guix is basically the perfect setup used
|
|
|
|
|
for Guile hacking (info "(guile) Using Guile in Emacs"). First, you
|
|
|
|
|
need more than an editor, you need [[http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs][Emacs]], empowered by the wonderful
|
|
|
|
|
[[http://nongnu.org/geiser/][Geiser]].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geiser allows for interactive and incremental development from within
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs: code compilation and evaluation from within buffers, access to
|
|
|
|
|
on-line documentation (docstrings), context-sensitive completion, M-. to
|
|
|
|
|
jump to an object definition, a REPL to try out your code, and more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To actually edit the code, Emacs already has a neat Scheme mode. But in
|
|
|
|
|
addition to that, you must not miss [[http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/ParEdit][Paredit]]. It provides facilities to
|
|
|
|
|
directly operate on the syntax tree, such as raising an s-expression or
|
|
|
|
|
wrapping it, swallowing or rejecting the following s-expression, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-04 19:45:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
* Adding new packages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Package recipes in Guix look like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
(name "nettle")
|
|
|
|
|
(version "2.5")
|
|
|
|
|
(source
|
|
|
|
|
(origin
|
2012-11-21 15:56:43 +01:00
|
|
|
|
(method url-fetch)
|
|
|
|
|
(uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/nettle/nettle-"
|
2012-11-04 19:45:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
version ".tar.gz"))
|
|
|
|
|
(sha256
|
|
|
|
|
(base32
|
|
|
|
|
"0wicr7amx01l03rm0pzgr1qvw3f9blaw17vjsy1301dh13ll58aa"))))
|
|
|
|
|
(build-system gnu-build-system)
|
2013-01-17 23:53:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
(inputs `(("m4" ,m4)))
|
2012-11-04 19:45:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
(propagated-inputs `(("gmp" ,gmp)))
|
|
|
|
|
(home-page
|
|
|
|
|
"http://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/nettle/")
|
|
|
|
|
(synopsis "GNU Nettle, a cryptographic library")
|
|
|
|
|
(description
|
|
|
|
|
"Nettle is a cryptographic library...")
|
2013-01-17 23:53:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
(license gpl2+))
|
2012-11-04 19:45:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Such a recipe can be written by hand, and then tested by running
|
2013-06-04 10:29:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
‘./pre-inst-env guix build nettle’.
|
2012-11-04 19:45:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When writing the recipe, the base32-encoded SHA256 hash of the source
|
|
|
|
|
code tarball, which can be seen in the example above, can be obtained by
|
|
|
|
|
running:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-04 10:29:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
guix download http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/nettle/nettle-2.5.tar.gz
|
2012-11-04 19:45:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, it is possible to semi-automatically import recipes from
|
|
|
|
|
the [[http://nixos.org/nixpkgs/][Nixpkgs]] software distribution using this command:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-04 10:29:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
guix import /path/to/nixpkgs/checkout nettle
|
2012-11-04 19:45:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The command automatically fetches and converts to Guix the “Nix
|
|
|
|
|
expression” of Nettle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-04 10:29:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
* Submitting Patches
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development is done using the Git distributed version control system. Thus,
|
|
|
|
|
access to the repository is not strictly necessary. We welcome contributions
|
|
|
|
|
in the form of patches as produced by ‘git format-patch’ sent to
|
|
|
|
|
bug-guix@gnu.org. Please write commit logs in the [[http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Change-Logs.html#Change-Logs][GNU ChangeLog format]].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As you become a regular contributor, you may find it convenient to have write
|
|
|
|
|
access to the repository (see below.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Commit Access
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For frequent contributors, having write access to the repository is
|
|
|
|
|
convenient. When you deem it necessary, feel free to ask for it on the
|
|
|
|
|
mailing list. When you get commit access, please make sure to follow the
|
|
|
|
|
policy below (discussions of the policy can take place on bug-guix@gnu.org.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-trivial patches should always be posted to bug-guix@gnu.org (trivial
|
|
|
|
|
patches include fixing typos, etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For patches that just add a new package, and a simple one, it’s OK to commit,
|
2013-06-10 00:00:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
if you’re confident (which means you successfully built it in a chroot setup,
|
|
|
|
|
and have done a reasonable copyright and license auditing.) Likewise for
|
|
|
|
|
package upgrades. We have a mailing list for commit notifications
|
|
|
|
|
(guix-commits@gnu.org), so people can notice. Before pushing your changes,
|
|
|
|
|
make sure to run ‘git pull --rebase’.
|
2013-06-04 10:29:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For anything else, please post to bug-guix@gnu.org and leave time for a
|
|
|
|
|
review, without committing anything. If you didn’t receive any reply
|
|
|
|
|
after two weeks, and if you’re confident, it’s OK to commit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That last part is subject to being adjusted, allowing individuals to commit
|
|
|
|
|
directly on non-controversial changes on parts they’re familiar with.
|