gnu: shadow: Fix CVE-2018-7169.
* gnu/packages/patches/shadow-CVE-2018-7169.patch: New file. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. * gnu/packages/admin.scm (shadow)[source]: Use it.
This commit is contained in:
parent
71f9ca53e5
commit
20ecede969
|
@ -1082,6 +1082,7 @@ dist_patch_DATA = \
|
|||
%D%/packages/patches/scotch-test-threading.patch \
|
||||
%D%/packages/patches/sdl-libx11-1.6.patch \
|
||||
%D%/packages/patches/seq24-rename-mutex.patch \
|
||||
%D%/packages/patches/shadow-CVE-2018-7169.patch \
|
||||
%D%/packages/patches/shepherd-close-fds.patch \
|
||||
%D%/packages/patches/shepherd-herd-status-sorted.patch \
|
||||
%D%/packages/patches/shishi-fix-libgcrypt-detection.patch \
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ hostname.")
|
|||
(uri (string-append
|
||||
"https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/releases/"
|
||||
"download/" version "/shadow-" version ".tar.xz"))
|
||||
(patches (search-patches "shadow-CVE-2018-7169.patch"))
|
||||
(sha256
|
||||
(base32
|
||||
"0hdpai78n63l3v3fgr3kkiqzhd0awrpfnnzz4mf7lmxdh61qb37w"))))
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
|
|||
Fix CVE-2018-7169:
|
||||
|
||||
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-7169
|
||||
|
||||
Patch copied from upstream source repository:
|
||||
|
||||
https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/commit/fb28c99b8a66ff2605c5cb96abc0a4d975f92de0
|
||||
|
||||
From fb28c99b8a66ff2605c5cb96abc0a4d975f92de0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
|
||||
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 23:49:40 +1100
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] newgidmap: enforce setgroups=deny if self-mapping a group
|
||||
|
||||
This is necessary to match the kernel-side policy of "self-mapping in a
|
||||
user namespace is fine, but you cannot drop groups" -- a policy that was
|
||||
created in order to stop user namespaces from allowing trivial privilege
|
||||
escalation by dropping supplementary groups that were "blacklisted" from
|
||||
certain paths.
|
||||
|
||||
This is the simplest fix for the underlying issue, and effectively makes
|
||||
it so that unless a user has a valid mapping set in /etc/subgid (which
|
||||
only administrators can modify) -- and they are currently trying to use
|
||||
that mapping -- then /proc/$pid/setgroups will be set to deny. This
|
||||
workaround is only partial, because ideally it should be possible to set
|
||||
an "allow_setgroups" or "deny_setgroups" flag in /etc/subgid to allow
|
||||
administrators to further restrict newgidmap(1).
|
||||
|
||||
We also don't write anything in the "allow" case because "allow" is the
|
||||
default, and users may have already written "deny" even if they
|
||||
technically are allowed to use setgroups. And we don't write anything if
|
||||
the setgroups policy is already "deny".
|
||||
|
||||
Ref: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1729357
|
||||
Fixes: CVE-2018-7169
|
||||
Reported-by: Craig Furman <craig.furman89@gmail.com>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
|
||||
---
|
||||
src/newgidmap.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
|
||||
1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/src/newgidmap.c b/src/newgidmap.c
|
||||
index b1e33513..59a2e75c 100644
|
||||
--- a/src/newgidmap.c
|
||||
+++ b/src/newgidmap.c
|
||||
@@ -46,32 +46,37 @@
|
||||
*/
|
||||
const char *Prog;
|
||||
|
||||
-static bool verify_range(struct passwd *pw, struct map_range *range)
|
||||
+
|
||||
+static bool verify_range(struct passwd *pw, struct map_range *range, bool *allow_setgroups)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* An empty range is invalid */
|
||||
if (range->count == 0)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
- /* Test /etc/subgid */
|
||||
- if (have_sub_gids(pw->pw_name, range->lower, range->count))
|
||||
+ /* Test /etc/subgid. If the mapping is valid then we allow setgroups. */
|
||||
+ if (have_sub_gids(pw->pw_name, range->lower, range->count)) {
|
||||
+ *allow_setgroups = true;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
|
||||
- /* Allow a process to map its own gid */
|
||||
- if ((range->count == 1) && (pw->pw_gid == range->lower))
|
||||
+ /* Allow a process to map its own gid. */
|
||||
+ if ((range->count == 1) && (pw->pw_gid == range->lower)) {
|
||||
+ /* noop -- if setgroups is enabled already we won't disable it. */
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void verify_ranges(struct passwd *pw, int ranges,
|
||||
- struct map_range *mappings)
|
||||
+ struct map_range *mappings, bool *allow_setgroups)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct map_range *mapping;
|
||||
int idx;
|
||||
|
||||
mapping = mappings;
|
||||
for (idx = 0; idx < ranges; idx++, mapping++) {
|
||||
- if (!verify_range(pw, mapping)) {
|
||||
+ if (!verify_range(pw, mapping, allow_setgroups)) {
|
||||
fprintf(stderr, _( "%s: gid range [%lu-%lu) -> [%lu-%lu) not allowed\n"),
|
||||
Prog,
|
||||
mapping->upper,
|
||||
@@ -89,6 +94,70 @@ static void usage(void)
|
||||
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+void write_setgroups(int proc_dir_fd, bool allow_setgroups)
|
||||
+{
|
||||
+ int setgroups_fd;
|
||||
+ char *policy, policy_buffer[4096];
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ /*
|
||||
+ * Default is "deny", and any "allow" will out-rank a "deny". We don't
|
||||
+ * forcefully write an "allow" here because the process we are writing
|
||||
+ * mappings for may have already set themselves to "deny" (and "allow"
|
||||
+ * is the default anyway). So allow_setgroups == true is a noop.
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ policy = "deny\n";
|
||||
+ if (allow_setgroups)
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ setgroups_fd = openat(proc_dir_fd, "setgroups", O_RDWR|O_CLOEXEC);
|
||||
+ if (setgroups_fd < 0) {
|
||||
+ /*
|
||||
+ * If it's an ENOENT then we are on too old a kernel for the setgroups
|
||||
+ * code to exist. Emit a warning and bail on this.
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ if (ENOENT == errno) {
|
||||
+ fprintf(stderr, _("%s: kernel doesn't support setgroups restrictions\n"), Prog);
|
||||
+ goto out;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+ fprintf(stderr, _("%s: couldn't open process setgroups: %s\n"),
|
||||
+ Prog,
|
||||
+ strerror(errno));
|
||||
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ /*
|
||||
+ * Check whether the policy is already what we want. /proc/self/setgroups
|
||||
+ * is write-once, so attempting to write after it's already written to will
|
||||
+ * fail.
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ if (read(setgroups_fd, policy_buffer, sizeof(policy_buffer)) < 0) {
|
||||
+ fprintf(stderr, _("%s: failed to read setgroups: %s\n"),
|
||||
+ Prog,
|
||||
+ strerror(errno));
|
||||
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+ if (!strncmp(policy_buffer, policy, strlen(policy)))
|
||||
+ goto out;
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ /* Write the policy. */
|
||||
+ if (lseek(setgroups_fd, 0, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
|
||||
+ fprintf(stderr, _("%s: failed to seek setgroups: %s\n"),
|
||||
+ Prog,
|
||||
+ strerror(errno));
|
||||
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+ if (dprintf(setgroups_fd, "%s", policy) < 0) {
|
||||
+ fprintf(stderr, _("%s: failed to setgroups %s policy: %s\n"),
|
||||
+ Prog,
|
||||
+ policy,
|
||||
+ strerror(errno));
|
||||
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+
|
||||
+out:
|
||||
+ close(setgroups_fd);
|
||||
+}
|
||||
+
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* newgidmap - Set the gid_map for the specified process
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -103,6 +172,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
struct stat st;
|
||||
struct passwd *pw;
|
||||
int written;
|
||||
+ bool allow_setgroups = false;
|
||||
|
||||
Prog = Basename (argv[0]);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -145,7 +215,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
(unsigned long) getuid ()));
|
||||
return EXIT_FAILURE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
-
|
||||
+
|
||||
/* Get the effective uid and effective gid of the target process */
|
||||
if (fstat(proc_dir_fd, &st) < 0) {
|
||||
fprintf(stderr, _("%s: Could not stat directory for target %u\n"),
|
||||
@@ -177,8 +247,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
if (!mappings)
|
||||
usage();
|
||||
|
||||
- verify_ranges(pw, ranges, mappings);
|
||||
+ verify_ranges(pw, ranges, mappings, &allow_setgroups);
|
||||
|
||||
+ write_setgroups(proc_dir_fd, allow_setgroups);
|
||||
write_mapping(proc_dir_fd, ranges, mappings, "gid_map");
|
||||
sub_gid_close();
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.16.2
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue