refresh: Report packages using the "@" syntax.
* guix/scripts/refresh.scm (list-dependents)[full-name]: New procedure. Use 'full-name' instead of 'package-full-name'. * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix refresh): Adjust example accordingly.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f432254237
commit
6d1a5e5ffd
|
@ -5852,7 +5852,7 @@ an upgrade. More rebuilds might be required under some circumstances.
|
|||
@example
|
||||
$ guix refresh --list-dependent flex
|
||||
Building the following 120 packages would ensure 213 dependent packages are rebuilt:
|
||||
hop-2.4.0 geiser-0.4 notmuch-0.18 mu-0.9.9.5 cflow-1.4 idutils-4.6 @dots{}
|
||||
hop@@2.4.0 geiser@@0.4 notmuch@@0.18 mu@@0.9.9.5 cflow@@1.4 idutils@@4.6 @dots{}
|
||||
@end example
|
||||
|
||||
The command above lists a set of packages that could be built to check
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
|
||||
;;; Copyright © 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
|
||||
;;; Copyright © 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
|
||||
;;; Copyright © 2013 Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org>
|
||||
;;; Copyright © 2014 Eric Bavier <bavier@member.fsf.org>
|
||||
;;; Copyright © 2015 Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
|
||||
|
@ -315,6 +315,10 @@ WARN? is true and no updater exists for PACKAGE, print a warning."
|
|||
"List all the things that would need to be rebuilt if PACKAGES are changed."
|
||||
;; Using %BAG-NODE-TYPE is more accurate than using %PACKAGE-NODE-TYPE
|
||||
;; because it includes implicit dependencies.
|
||||
(define (full-name package)
|
||||
(string-append (package-name package) "@"
|
||||
(package-version package)))
|
||||
|
||||
(mlet %store-monad ((edges (node-back-edges %bag-node-type
|
||||
(all-packages))))
|
||||
(let* ((dependents (node-transitive-edges packages edges))
|
||||
|
@ -327,12 +331,12 @@ WARN? is true and no updater exists for PACKAGE, print a warning."
|
|||
(N_ "No dependents other than itself: ~{~a~}~%"
|
||||
"No dependents other than themselves: ~{~a~^ ~}~%"
|
||||
(length packages))
|
||||
(map package-full-name packages)))
|
||||
(map full-name packages)))
|
||||
|
||||
((x)
|
||||
(format (current-output-port)
|
||||
(_ "A single dependent package: ~a~%")
|
||||
(package-full-name x)))
|
||||
(full-name x)))
|
||||
(lst
|
||||
(format (current-output-port)
|
||||
(N_ "Building the following package would ensure ~d \
|
||||
|
@ -341,7 +345,7 @@ dependent packages are rebuilt: ~*~{~a~^ ~}~%"
|
|||
dependent packages are rebuilt: ~{~a~^ ~}~%"
|
||||
(length covering))
|
||||
(length covering) (length dependents)
|
||||
(map package-full-name covering))))
|
||||
(map full-name covering))))
|
||||
(return #t))))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue