From da6ce3f1b864077002d912a22a40f31c57bc2d43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Federico Beffa Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:04:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: python-scipy: Update to 0.15.0. * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-scipy): Update to 0.15.0. --- gnu/packages/python.scm | 20 ++++---------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm index a1be20c21f..2f518d940d 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/python.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ ;;; Copyright © 2013, 2014 Andreas Enge ;;; Copyright © 2014 Mark H Weaver ;;; Copyright © 2014 Eric Bavier -;;; Copyright © 2014 Federico Beffa +;;; Copyright © 2014, 2015 Federico Beffa ;;; ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. ;;; @@ -2271,30 +2271,18 @@ toolkits.") ,@(alist-delete "python-numpydoc" (package-inputs matplotlib))))))) -;; Scipy 0.14.0 with Numpy 0.19.X fails several tests. This is known and -;; planned to be fixed in 0.14.1. It is claimed that the failures can safely -;; be ignored: -;; http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/2014-September/020043.html -;; https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/3853 -;; -;; The main test suite procedure prints the summary message: -;; -;; Ran 16412 tests in 245.033s -;; FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=277, SKIP=921, errors=327, failures=42) -;; -;; However, it still does return normally. (define-public python-scipy (package (name "python-scipy") - (version "0.14.0") + (version "0.15.0") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/scipy" - "/scipy-" version ".tar.gz")) + "/scipy-" version ".tar.xz")) (sha256 (base32 - "053bmz4qmnk4dmxvspfak8r10rpmy6mzwfzgy33z338ppzka6hab")))) + "0fsqi05s035d7p6s8h3h2pvk1axias16chy17rw9l1bxvrfhmncf")))) (build-system python-build-system) (inputs `(("python-numpy" ,python-numpy)