The reachable range is 2100x14800, highest pressure is 1023. Unlike the slate
the paper block still affords to address almost the whole range even though
the paper is slightly narrower than the range - but it can slide left/right by
about 5mm.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Because it's annoying when there's an issue with the timestamp in the file and
you have to grep for the file name.
And while we're there, change the human readable date to be actually readable.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
It's the same message with a different argument, let's try not to do
gymnastics in the Msg code just so we can return a tuple.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We can hook into the ProtocolVersion here, so let's de-duplicate this.
Should be backwards-compatible for config files but new config files will have
the uppercase name written now.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is still a bit awkward because the communication of the spark especially
is so strange. It sends a (rejected) uuid, then a single command to register
that UUID. The Slate and the IntuosPro are more sensible, they seem to have a
special message to register a UUID - that one either fails or succeeds.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The default timeout is too short for registering a button, let's control this
from the message.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is an in-situ replacement of the old functionality vs the new one,
resulting in a bit of duplication. Now that the Protocol takes care of the
device-specifics most of our functions look identical. This will be fixed in a
follow-up commit.
Missing from the conversion here is the initial register handling (too
convoluted right now) and the parsing of the pen data.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is only the framework for a new protocol handler that should simplify
adding, extending and debugging the actual protocol messages.
The summary is:
- each protocol interaction is a subclass of Msg() that handles the data sent
and received from the device.
- the list of messages for each device is stored in a dictionary the caller
initializes by providing the protocol version
- those messages are addressable via the Interactions enum through the
Protocol class
- the messages can be run via execute(), taking and setting the obvious
properties on the object
- actual communication is done via a single callback that takes/returns a
NordicData object for the request/reply.
So after the basic setup, the caller can do this:
p = Protocol(ProtocolVersion.INTUOS_PRO)
name = p.execute(Interactions.GET_NAME).name
p.execute(Interactions.SET_TIME, time.time())
This completely separates the protocol from the implementation where we want
the result of that exchange, ideally paving the way for better testing and
easier debugging of what's happening on the wire. Well, ether.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This function doesn't process the data beyond the logging required. It simply
sends the request and returns the reply, whatever that is.
Currently unused, this is prep work for later.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
For testing it's a lot easier to just provide a /tmp/ directory than having to
clear out the normal one that may contain useful drawings for debugging.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Regression introduced in e1a3675439
Where a device has no config entry, the e1a367 change would return early. This
is fine for devices previously seen and still lingering in the config but for
completely new devices, we'll never get past that KeyError.
Return to the old behaviour: where we don't have a stored UUID we continue
with the None UUID.
Fixes#148
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We want the most-recent drawings up the top. And since we always add to the
flowbox, we need to reverse-sort everything.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If we have more data than our packet [1], let's not return the whole data
array. Slice it to size instead.
[1] this never happens with the current code, we don't work asynchronously
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
we don't need the same-ish check twice, we can just pop our non-list into a
list an go from there.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Peter Hutterer